Advertisement

Advertisement

spine surgery

Refractory Back Pain after Surgery: an Overview of the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS)

Teaser: 

1Zhi Wang BSc, MSc MD FRCSC, 2Ali Ghoul MD, 3Jesse Shen MD, PhD Candidate, 4Amer Sebaaly MSc, MD,

1Associate Professor, Montreal University (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec. 2PGY 3 Orthopaedic Resident, Saint Joseph University, Beirut Lebanon. 3PGY 5 Montreal University, Montreal Quebec. 4Orthopedic Lecturer, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract: “Lumbar spinal pain of unknown origin, either persisting despite surgical intervention or appearing after surgical intervention for spinal pain, originating in the same topographical location” is a description widely used to describe Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). In reality, the syndrome is more often a mismatch between the patient’s expectations and the surgical results. This review will describe the possible causes and presentation of FBSS and highlight the role of the multidisciplinary team approach in its management involving non-operative and surgical interventions. The most important objective is correct patient selection for surgery before the first operation.
Key Words: Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, multi-disciplinary approach, spine surgery, low back pain, patient expectations.

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim MAINPRO-M2 Credits for this unaccredited educational program.

www.cfpc.ca/Mainpro_M2

You can take quizzes without subscribing; however, your results will not be stored. Subscribers will have access to their quiz results for future reference.

Pre-test CME Quiz Post-test CME Quiz
1. Fusing even a short segment of the spine can have significant, possibly deleterious effects, on the complex spinal functions.
2. The Failed Back Syndrome is often a mismatch between the patient's expectations and the final result rather than a failure of surgical technique.
3. The poor result may be the result of preoperative, intraoperative or postoperative factors. All three areas must be assessed.
4. Correct patient selection is as important or even more important than the surgical approach.
The incidence of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome ranges from 10-40% after a major spinal operation.
Setting the preoperative expectations with a full discussion between the patient, referring physician and operating surgeon plays a key role.
There are three periods – pre-operative, intra-operative, post-operative–in which FBSS can arise.
Proper patient selection and pre-operative optimization of all modifiable factors improve outcomes and decrease the possibility of FBSS.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $80 USD per year and you will gain full access to all the premium content on www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and more as well as within the mobile app.
Related Terms: Back Health, failed back surgery syndrome, low back pain, multidisciplinary approach, spine surgery, patient expectations
Disclaimer: 
Disclaimer at the end of each page

Frailty in Adult Spine Surgery—A Clinical Update

Teaser: 

1Eryck Moskven, MD,2Raphaële Charest-Morin, MD, FRCSC,

1PGY 1, Department of Orthopaedics, Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. 2Clinical Assistant Professor, Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract: Purpose: Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability. This paper reviews the definitions and applicability of frailty tools and discusses the impact of frailty in patients with spinal disease.
Recent Findings: Frailty is a significant risk factor for postoperative adverse-events (AEs), prolonged postoperative length of stay (LOS), adverse discharge disposition, and mortality following spine surgery. Cumulative deficit measures such as the mFI are appropriate risk stratification tools, while phenotypic measures are sensitive to capturing the relationship between spine disease and spine surgery on the frailty trajectory.
Summary: Frailty in patients with spinal disorders is predictive of postoperative adverse outcomes. The role of spine surgery to reverse frailty requires investigation.
Key Words: frailty, spine surgery, adverse outcomes, geriatric.

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim MAINPRO-M2 Credits for this unaccredited educational program.

www.cfpc.ca/Mainpro_M2

You can take quizzes without subscribing; however, your results will not be stored. Subscribers will have access to their quiz results for future reference.

Pre-test CME Quiz Post-test CME Quiz
Frailty is a state of decreased reserve and increased vulnerability associated with adverse health outcomes.
Clinical frailty measures derived from the cumulative deficit model of frailty such as the mFI are appropriate risk stratification tools for identifying patients at an increased risk of postoperative AEs following spine surgery.
Frailty tools with phenotypic constructs are the most sensitive measures in capturing the relationship between spinal pathology and surgical intervention on the frailty trajectory.
When assessing an elderly patient, the FRAIL acronym is a helpful guide to screen for frailty - F (fatigue), R (resistance/muscular weakness), A (ambulatory difficulty), I (illness and comorbidities), and L (unintentional loss of weight).
Access to a readily available clinical frailty assessment tool on a mobile device, such as the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), reduces the need for extensive chart review to calculate and determine frailty severity.
When assessing for surgical candidacy the clinician should evaluate the impact of spinal pathology on health-related quality of life, the magnitude of the proposed surgical intervention and the frailty status.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $80 USD per year and you will gain full access to all the premium content on www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and more as well as within the mobile app.
Related Terms: Back Health, frailty, spine surgery, adverse outcomes, geriatrics
Disclaimer: 
Disclaimer at the end of each page

Development and Implementation of a National Canadian Spine Surgery Registry

Teaser: 

1Greg McIntosh,2Dr. Michael Craig, 3Dr. Charles Fisher,

1Director of Research Operations, Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.
2Neurosurgery Resident at Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia. 3Professor and Head of the Division of Spine Surgery, Combined Neurosurgical and Orthopaedic Spine Program, University of British Columbia.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract:The goal of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) is to develop a registry for Canadian orthopaedic and neurosurgical spine surgeons to participate in prospective multi-centre trials and retrospective reviews utilizing multivariable analyses. The design allows ongoing research and contains clinical details necessary for epidemiological assessment. Currently, 21 hospital sites, representing 9 provinces, participate CSORN. A total of 81 investigators have enrolled over 11,000 spine patients; 78% thoracolumbar and 22% cervical. Predictive models, effectiveness of surgical procedures, wait time issues and patient-surgeon expectations are some of the specific topics already published with CSORN data.
Key Words: registry, spine surgery, data quality, outcomes.

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim MAINPRO-M2 Credits for this unaccredited educational program.

www.cfpc.ca/Mainpro_M2

You can take quizzes without subscribing; however, your results will not be stored. Subscribers will have access to their quiz results for future reference.

Pre-test CME Quiz Post-test CME Quiz
Collection, feedback and publication of registry data is now a recognized way of informing clinical practice, driving quality improvement and improving patient outcomes.
The Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) is a multicentre national initiative that prospectively enrols consecutive patients with spinal pathology requiring surgical treatment.
The CSORN registry is designed to assess the value of operative techniques on patient outcomes.
Both patients and providers can feel powerless to enact any real change over the healthcare system. Patient participation in a properly designed registry gives them the opportunity to contribute to improving healthcare delivery.
The need for documentation of clinical outcomes is as important in spinal surgery as it is in other medical specialties.
If the value of spine surgery is not well established, then the cheapest options, rather than potentially better ones, are more likely to be endorsed.
Registries require fewer resources and often avoid the constraints of randomized clinical trials; as a result, registry findings usually have strong external validity and generalizability.
Collecting quality of life and patient-reported outcome measures data are essential for treatment evaluation.
Patients (and their physicians) should not fear participation in well-designed registries.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $80 USD per year and you will gain full access to all the premium content on www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and more as well as within the mobile app.
Related Terms: Back Health, registry, spine surgery, data quality, outcomes
Disclaimer: 
Disclaimer at the end of each page

Teaser with 2 Mobile Images and YouTube Animation

Teaser with 2 Mobile Images and YouTube Animation

Teaser: 

Michael S. Taccone,1 Markian Pahuta,2 Darren M.Roffey,3,4 Eugene K. Wai,2,3,4

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

2Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

3Ottawa Combined Adult Spinal Surgery Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

4Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract: Vertebral metastatic disease afflicts a significant proportion of cancer patients, most commonly those with breast and lung disease. Symptoms can include tumor-related pain, neurological deficit from spinal cord or nerve compression and pathological fracture with mechanical instability. Appropriate workup includes identifying the primary disease, defining the extent of spinal and extra-spinal pathology and classifying spinal stability based on the pattern of osseous involvement. Specific therapy for the vertebral metastatic disease can include pharmacologic therapy to deliver analgesia, steroids, bisphosphonate, anti-neoplastic therapy, radiation therapy as either primary or adjuvant therapy and surgical intervention for mechanical or neurologic instability.
Key Words: Vertebral metastatic disease, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, spinal instability, spine surgery, spinal radiation therapy, pathologic fracture.

Red flags are non-specific and unreliable means of determining spinal malignancy in patients with back pain. Clinical suspicion combined with history and physical exam are best for increasing pre-test probability of imaging studies.
Initial evaluation and referral to definitive management should be made within 24 hours of detection of significant neurological deficit, significant metastatic epidural spinal cord compression or instability.
MRI is the imaging modality of choice for initial evaluation and assessment of overall spinal tumor burden.
Vertebral metastatic disease is very common in patients with cancer.
SINS, ESCCS, Tomita score, Tokuhashi score and the Modified Bauer scores are all important tools for determining the most appropriate referral.
In eligible candidates, surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy yields faster and more sustainable neurologic stability and recovery.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $19.99 per year and you will gain full access to the all the premium app content as well as full access to www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and conference reports. Please note that in order for us to activate your online account, you will need to provide your email address when prompted during the subscription purchase through iTunes.
SUBSCRIBE »
Related Terms: Other, Vertebral metastatic disease, spine surgery, spinal radiation therapy

Referral Criteria for Non-Emergent Spinal Symptoms in the Neck and Low Back: A Survey of Canadian Spine Surgeons

Teaser: 

Yoga Raja Rampersaud, MD, FRCSC,1 Dr. Hamilton Hall, MD, FRCSC,2

1Associate Professor Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Divisions of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery University Health Network Medical Director, Back and Neck Specialty Program, Altum Health, Past President Canadian Spine Society.
2is a Professor in the Department of Surgery at the University of Toronto. He is the Medical Director, CBI Health Group and Executive Director of the Canadian Spine Society in Toronto, Ontario.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract: The majority of the patients referred for surgical consultation are not candidates for surgery. Appropriate operative candidates endure unnecessary and potentially detrimental delays in obtaining their surgery while the rest waste time waiting to be told that surgery is not the answer. The Canadian Spine Society surveyed its membership to establish a set of practical surgical referral recommendations for non-emergent spinal problems. The results support referrals of patients with leg or arm dominant pain but, in the absence of a significant structural abnormality, discourage referring patients with neck or back dominant symptoms.
Key Words: spine surgery, indications, referral, clinical presentations, non-emergent.

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim MAINPRO-M2 Credits for this unaccredited educational program.

www.cfpc.ca/Mainpro_M2

You can take quizzes without subscribing; however, your results will not be stored. Subscribers will have access to their quiz results for future reference.

Pre-test CME Quiz Post-test CME Quiz
There is no universally acceptable ideal candidate, absolute indication or unqualified contraindication for elective spinal surgery.
Referral is recommended most often for patients who have constant arm or leg dominant pain.
Patients who have untreated neck or back dominant pain are not appropriate surgical referrals.
Surgeons insistence on an image or refusal to see a suitable patient who rejects surgery reflect the excessive demand on their time, which can be relieved with proper referral.
The recommendation for referral is highest when the patient has had aappropriate non-operative treatment: well supervised physical therapy, suitable medication, effective education and successful lifestyle modification.
Spine related arm and leg dominant pain are usually the result of specific nerve root pathologies and therefore are more likely amenable to surgical intervention than back or neck pain which are generally multifactorial.
Patients with disabling or progressive neurological deficits should be referred early; patients with little or no pain and with no functional limitation related to the neurological deficit are not recommended for referral.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $80 USD per year and you will gain full access to all the premium content on www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and more as well as within the mobile app.
Related Terms: Back Health, spine surgery, indications, referral, clinical presentation, non-emergent

Vertebral Metastatic Disease: A Practice Guideline for the General Practitioner

Vertebral Metastatic Disease: A Practice Guideline for the General Practitioner

Teaser: 

Michael S. Taccone,1 Markian Pahuta,2 Darren M.Roffey,3,4Eugene K. Wai,2,3,4

1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
2Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
3Ottawa Combined Adult Spinal Surgery Program, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
4Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

CLINICAL TOOLS

Abstract: Vertebral metastatic disease afflicts a significant proportion of cancer patients, most commonly those with breast and lung disease. Symptoms can include tumor-related pain, neurological deficit from spinal cord or nerve compression and pathological fracture with mechanical instability. Appropriate workup includes identifying the primary disease, defining the extent of spinal and extra-spinal pathology and classifying spinal stability based on the pattern of osseous involvement. Specific therapy for the vertebral metastatic disease can include pharmacologic therapy to deliver analgesia, steroids, bisphosphonate, anti-neoplastic therapy, radiation therapy as either primary or adjuvant therapy and surgical intervention for mechanical or neurologic instability.
Key Words: Vertebral metastatic disease, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, spinal instability, spine surgery, spinal radiation therapy, pathologic fracture.

Members of the College of Family Physicians of Canada may claim MAINPRO-M2 Credits for this unaccredited educational program.

www.cfpc.ca/Mainpro_M2

You can take quizzes without subscribing; however, your results will not be stored. Subscribers will have access to their quiz results for future reference.

Pre-test CME Quiz Post-test CME Quiz
Red flags are non-specific and unreliable means of determining spinal malignancy in patients with back pain. Clinical suspicion combined with history and physical exam are best for increasing pre-test probability of imaging studies.
Initial evaluation and referral to definitive management should be made within 24 hours of detection of significant neurological deficit, significant metastatic epidural spinal cord compression or instability.
MRI is the imaging modality of choice for initial evaluation and assessment of overall spinal tumor burden.
Vertebral metastatic disease is very common in patients with cancer.
SINS, ESCCS, Tomita score, Tokuhashi score and the Modified Bauer scores are all important tools for determining the most appropriate referral.
In eligible candidates, surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy yields faster and more sustainable neurologic stability and recovery.
To have access to full article that these tools were developed for, please subscribe. The cost to subscribe is $80 USD per year and you will gain full access to all the premium content on www.healthplexus.net, an educational portal, that hosts 1000s of clinical reviews, case studies, educational visual aids and more as well as within the mobile app.
Related Terms: Back Health, Vertebral metastatic disease, metastatic epidural spinal cord compression, spinal instability, spine surgery, spinal radiation therapy, pathologic fracture