A. Mark Clarfield, MD
In 1989 the first Canadian Consensus Conference on the Assessment of Dementia (CCCAD) met in Montreal to try to come to grips with the vexed question of dementia assessment. In those days, there was still a lively debate going about the extent to which dementia should be worked up in an attempt to find the "reversible" cases.
Nearly ten years later in 1998, the group reconvened to look at assessment again but extended its mandate as well. What follows is a brief "compare and contrast" essay which examines what the two meetings had in common as well as how they differed.
To start off, they were both held in the beautiful city of Montreal, in 1989 under the joint chairmanship of myself and Dr. Serge Gauthier. In 1998, Dr. Gauthier was still in charge but this time Dr. Chris Patterson of McMaster University joined as the co-chair. (In 1992, I had moved to Israel, but was honoured to be invited back.)
In 1989 before (or perhaps at the beginning of) the extensive government cutbacks, we were able to fund the meeting with 50% government money, both federal and Quebec provincial. The rest of the support came from private sources, mainly drug companies. By 1998 it seems that government wanted no part of consensus meetings at least in the field of the dementias, and they did not participate in the funding this time.
A decade ago the 38 participants were mainly Canadian with four American visitors.
